• Haleigh Cummings: Holes in the Story?

    0
    scissors
    February 23rd, 2009CatWomanUncategorized

    During a news conference held this afternoon, investigators indicated that details about the clothes Haleigh Ann Marie Cummings was wearing when she vanished were different from what was originally reported.

    Police just aren’t sure what Haleigh Cummings was wearing when she disappeared, after all. At first she was reportedly wearing a pink shirt and underwear, but now police say not to focus on the little girl’s clothing - focus on her face.

    Haleigh’s status as a missing person has also been changed - she’s considered endangered, as well. She probably always was, but police in Putnam County have pointedly changed the flyer giving details about Haleigh to read “ENDANGERED.”

    Investigators have re-examined a number of places they’d already covered and they still don’t feel any closer to solving the mystery behind this child’s disappearance. Everyone is basically still a suspect. Except, perhaps, for the infamous 44 local sex offenders mentioned so often in initial coverage of the case. Putnam County authorities say the sex offenders’ homes have been searched, the offenders questioned, and none of them are suspects or persons-of-interest in this case.

    Does this change in the description of Haleigh’s clothes represent new holes in the story of that night as it’s been told so far? It was hard to tell from the press conference, as police refused to elaborate much past telling the public to focus on Haleigh’s features, her physical appearance. Still - it is grist for the mill for those who are already deeply suspicious of Haleigh’s father, Ronald Cummings, and his teen girlfriend, Misty Croslin.





Leave a Reply

Clickcha - The One-click Captcha